Can Red Light Therapy Cause Cancer? What the Research Actually Says

This is probably the number one question people ask before trying red light therapy. And honestly, it makes sense. We've been told for decades to protect ourselves from harmful light, so the idea of intentionally exposing your body to concentrated light feels counterintuitive.

Let me clear this up once and for all.

The confusion usually comes from lumping all light therapy together. Tanning beds use ultraviolet (UV) radiation, which damages DNA and absolutely increases cancer risk. Red light therapy operates in a completely different part of the spectrum.

Red light (630-700nm) and near-infrared light (700-1100nm) are non-ionizing. They don't have enough energy to damage DNA or cause mutations. This is basic physics, not marketing spin.

There are over 5,000 peer-reviewed studies on photobiomodulation (the scientific term for red light therapy). Not a single one has shown any carcinogenic effects. In fact, some research suggests red light may actually have protective properties against certain types of cellular damage.

Some people worry specifically about melanoma. Again, melanoma is caused by UV radiation damaging skin cells. Red and near-infrared wavelengths don't interact with your skin the same way. They penetrate deeper and work at the cellular level to support mitochondrial function, not damage it.

Red light therapy has been used safely for decades in clinical settings. The technology is well-understood, heavily researched, and fundamentally different from the UV radiation that causes skin damage. Your concern is valid, but the science is clear: red light therapy does not cause cancer.